"But it will be said, is this all that Pure Reason can do when it
gazes out beyond the bounds of experience? Nothing more than two
articles of faith? Common sense could achieve as much without
calling the philosophers to its counsels!
"I will not here speak of the service which philosophy has rendered
to human reason by the laborious efforts of its criticism, granting
that the outcome proves to be merely negative: about that matter
something is to be said in the following section. But do you then
ask, that the knowledge which interests all men shall transcend the
common understanding and be discovered for you only by
philosophers? The very thing which you make a reproach, is the best
confirmation of the justice of the previous conclusions, since it
shows that which could not, at first, have been anticipated:
namely, that in those matters which concern all men alike, nature
is not guilty of distributing her gifts with partiality; and that
the highest philosophy, in dealing with the most important concerns
of humanity, is able to take us no further than the guidance which
she affords to the commonest understanding."[44]
In short, nothing can be proved or disproved, respecting either the
distinct existence, the substance, or the durability of the soul. So
far, Kant is at one with Hume. But Kant adds, as you cannot disprove the
immortality of the soul, and as the belief therein is very useful for
moral purposes, you may assume it.
Pages:
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213